Harrods win court battle against Lady Gaga fur protestors

Restrictions on protests outside the Knightsbridge luxury store will be strengthened after the pop star's visit to launch her perfume range.

Harrods bosses had complained about the behaviour of activists last October who the court heard had caused a 'nuisance' to members of the public.

The High Court judge issued a written ruling claiming that current protest restrictions do not provide 'sufficient protection'.

Mr Justice Globe said: "It is Harrods' case that the (protesters) positioned themselves at the front of the crowds with banners and placards, in and amongst families and children, causing a nuisance, annoyance and harassment to members of the public in attendance enjoying the event.

"From statements, photographs and CCTV evidence, I have a very clear understanding of the nature of the event and what happened on this occasion."

The court heard anti-fur campaigners had began demonstrations outside Harrods in 2005

I am not satisfied that the existing order provides sufficient protection for the rights of the claimants

High Court judge Mr Justice Globe

The court heard anti-fur campaigners had began demonstrations outside Harrods in 2005 and that legal action had been launched shortly afterwards.

The judge said while exclusion zones had been established, it should be extended to a pedestrian area in front of the store which is a 'tourist hotspot'.

Mr Justice Globe added: "I am not satisfied that the existing order provides sufficient protection for the rights of the claimants, customers and the public to enjoy the facilities and events in the crescent.

"I am equally satisfied that the rights of the (protesters) can be protected by ensuring that they can continue to assemble and protest outside the Hans Crescent area